Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ ground (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ radials: 7738 ]

Total 7738 documents matching your query.

201. Re: Topband: raised radials (score: 122)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:24:10 -0500
the more i read, it seems raised radials are a fairly easy way to raise the effeciancy of a short vertical. Only if the original ground system is a meager system with significant loss. At my QTH on 4
/archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00385.html (8,477 bytes)

202. Re: Topband: Radials over a stone wall (score: 122)
Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:45:05 -0400
Hi Carl, The guys that built the stone wall did too good a job. I have been looking for that proverbial hole in the wall. N2TK, Tony What about pushing them thru holes in the wall? I do that with the
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00156.html (10,109 bytes)

203. Re: Topband: Radials over a stone wall (score: 122)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 10:44:22 -0600
Simulation will tell the tale but in the mean time we have two things caused by the up-and-over that we can mull over: 1) There is cancellation of the magnetic fields by the up-and-over wires thereby
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00155.html (10,876 bytes)

204. Re: Topband: Radials over a stone wall (score: 122)
Author: "Bill Wichers" <billw@waveform.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:26:22 -0400
I would expect an "up and over" to clear the wall would result in a choke-like effect on the radial and would, at best, reduce the radial's effectiveness. It should be easy to just drill some small (
/archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00153.html (9,992 bytes)

205. Re: Topband: Radials help (score: 122)
Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:15:52 -0500
Yes, FCP *was* originally designed to get small-lotters on top-band. My buddy Jack downsized and tore my heart out with his moaning about what he had done to his 160 results. But watch out when you s
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00184.html (16,027 bytes)

206. Re: Topband: Radials help (score: 122)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:01:59 -0500
The broadcasters also dont fall for the resonance bit either; very few radiators plus radials have anything to do with an actual resonance. All of this was explained back in the 30's. Carl KM1H _____
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00139.html (12,885 bytes)

207. Re: Topband: Radials help (score: 122)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:06:01 -0500
I think this is all being way over thought. It would be good to go back and study the work of Dr. Brown of RCA in the early 30s. At the time broadcast stations were using various iterations of wire a
/archives//html/Topband/2012-02/msg00127.html (13,501 bytes)

208. Re: Topband: Radials help (score: 122)
Author: DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:42:27 -0700
Bare radials will work just fine. You plan to use 16 quarter wavelength radials. If you are using (only) 16 to save on wire or installation labor you might want to install 32 eigth wavelength radials
/archives//html/Topband/2011-11/msg00057.html (8,475 bytes)

209. Re: Topband: soldering radials (score: 122)
Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:29:09 -0400
To be brief: At a prior QTH a 100' tower was topped by 4 el 10/15/20 monobanders and shunt fed for 160. I started with 20 radials ranging from 60-130' to fit the property. Performance sucked for chas
/archives//html/Topband/2011-08/msg00046.html (11,249 bytes)

210. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials (score: 122)
Author: DGB <ns9i2016@Bayland.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 10:46:45 -0500
When you use elevated radials, how do you transition them back down to the feed-point, which could be near ground or up a couple of feet? thanks Dwight NS9I __________________________________________
/archives//html/Topband/2010-10/msg00122.html (9,385 bytes)

211. Topband: radials direction and antenna efficiency (score: 122)
Author: tzikas tzik <tzitzikas77@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:44:54 +0300
Hi all. At this link http://tzitzikas.webs.com/radials_direction.JPG you can see my plan for radials installation.The sort radials are 1/8 and the longer 1/4 wave length. Radials are with blue color.
/archives//html/Topband/2010-08/msg00037.html (7,592 bytes)

212. Re: Topband: Forestry Effect on Antennas and Radials (score: 122)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2010 14:18:29 -0400
My Beverages (which are around 300 feet long) are 8 to 10 feet high because of the _people_ who walk in my woods. My Beverages -- though somewhat shorter -- are quite effective compared to my 1-eleme
/archives//html/Topband/2010-07/msg00010.html (11,183 bytes)

213. Re: Topband: Edger for burying ground radials ? (score: 122)
Author: "Dave Harmon" <k6xyz@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:08:57 -0600
I wrote a longer post earlier but it looks like it got moderated so I will just say that my radials are stapled to the ground and I mow the area that has radials....a neighbor gets the rest of the ha
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00168.html (10,641 bytes)

214. Topband: Radials for new 160 antenna (score: 122)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:29:20 EDT
I'm finally getting up a 160 antenna. Due to various factors, it will be a wire vertical about 90-100 feet tall and will be "T-topped" to make up the rest of the length. The support is a caternary sy
/archives//html/Topband/2009-09/msg00042.html (8,281 bytes)

215. Topband: small diaameter radials - issues? (score: 122)
Author: "Neil Carr G0JHC" <g0jhc@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:19:10 -0800
Interest in experiences from those of you who run good amounts of radials on LF and in particular quite thin wire. I have erected a 66ft 80m vertical but currently have very few radials down fanned o
/archives//html/Topband/2008-11/msg00094.html (7,936 bytes)

216. Re: Topband: radials under Beverage (score: 122)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:39:56 -0800
George, Let me expand on my earlier comment. The purpose of radials is to reduce losses in the earth under a vertical. It matters less what directions those radials run than the quantity of them and
/archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00172.html (8,547 bytes)

217. Re: Topband: radials (score: 122)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:32:29 -0800
When I lived in Florida on 1/2 acre, Louis, I started out with a 50' tall Marconi (flat-top was an 80 meter dipole) using 4 elevated radials and 100 watts. It didn't work all that well. Later, I adde
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00396.html (9,116 bytes)

218. Topband: tuned elevated radials (score: 122)
Author: Telegrapher9@aol.com
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:11:39 EST
Thanks to all for your comments. Tuned or Untuned Radials - that is the question I think the point of my previous post has been missed. The subject is tuned elevated topband radials. I'm wondering ho
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00349.html (10,457 bytes)

219. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials - W5UN's take (score: 122)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:16:33 -0400
radials per antenna, and these are 20 feet high and parallel to the ground. John, ON4UN, claims I now have a great dummy load on 160, hi. But its working for me. Soil conditions undoubtedly have some
/archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00052.html (9,134 bytes)

220. Topband: elevated radials (score: 122)
Author: charles Lewis <s9ss160m@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 04:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
For what it's worth, many of you worked S9SS in 2002, the year I returned to Sao Tome. The radiator was (and is) a 1/4 wave wire "T" with feed point to tip length of about 130'. The vertical run is a
/archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00043.html (9,881 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu