Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ ground (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ radials: 7735 ]

Total 7735 documents matching your query.

321. Topband: radials (score: 116)
Author: Brendan Minish <ei6iz.brendan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:22:36 +0000
Under my 1/4 wave Inverted L (~18M vertical section) I have a mix of buried radials and radials lying on the grass (for the winter months only) In total there are around 20 radials with lengths of be
/archives//html/Topband/2010-11/msg00011.html (7,373 bytes)

322. Topband: Elevated Radials as a sub for the real thing? (score: 116)
Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:10:47 -0400
Topbanders....on the issue of elevated radials that are of some significant distance above the actual ground are we not really dealing with a totally different configuration than a typical Marconi wi
/archives//html/Topband/2010-10/msg00127.html (9,796 bytes)

323. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials - Thanks for your Reply (score: 116)
Author: "Wayne Rogers" <n1wr@chesapeake.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 09:18:59 -0400
I have received 13 replies, on or off list, and would like to thank all for the quick replies. Many suggested going with 125' long radials, getting four of them out of the 500' roll of wire. There wa
/archives//html/Topband/2010-10/msg00114.html (7,368 bytes)

324. Re: Topband: Aluminum radials? (score: 116)
Author: Mike Waters W0BTU <mrscience65704@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Anyone ever try a protective anode to make their radials last? At a former QTH in NW Ohio, I had a ground-mounted vertical with 100 or so galvanized electric fence wire radials laid on the ground. F
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00090.html (9,256 bytes)

325. Topband: Radials Question (score: 116)
Author: "Gary Smith" <Gary@doctorgary.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:51:06 -0400
I have decided to move my antenna to a more secure location. One antenna is a butternut HF9V vertical and the top band antenna will be what is essentially an inverted L using the same radials as the
/archives//html/Topband/2008-10/msg00167.html (8,641 bytes)

326. Topband: Radials (score: 116)
Author: David Cole <g3rcq@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:47:31 +0000 (GMT)
Hi all and thanks for all the help on how deep to bury radials. My question this time - I am going to put in a 4 square and following ON4UN's book 4th ed page 11-85 states that it is standard procede
/archives//html/Topband/2008-02/msg00040.html (7,079 bytes)

327. Re: Topband: Quick question on radials (score: 116)
Author: <jacobsen_5@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:28:37 -0600
Ian, G3NRW, was asking about the most efficient use of wire for radials. Ian, IF I remember correctly, the ARRL antenna book OR ON4UN's book on low band antennas, has chart/graph on the most eff. use
/archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00065.html (7,748 bytes)

328. Topband: Binocular Cores & Radials (score: 116)
Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 08:56:58 -0600
Good morning All I have two unrelated items this morning. I promised a follow up on the binocular core debacle. Yesterday I built a new Xfrmr on that same core that gave me problems previously. It wo
/archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00044.html (8,235 bytes)

329. Topband: Checking buried ground radials (score: 116)
Author: "Richard Zwirko" <richk1htv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:59:34 -0400
Hello All, Is there some way to see if a radial is still intact ? I have buried radials and over time I think some have been broken. Any way to check ? Thanks Jerry, KE9I = = = Jerry, I worked at 50
/archives//html/Topband/2007-09/msg00067.html (8,798 bytes)

330. Topband: 1000m of radials (3280ft), how should I cut it ? (score: 116)
Author: Ffive VHN <f5vhn@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:47:09 +0000 (GMT)
'allo, I have got 1000m / 3280ft of wire to be used for radials. At the moment my garden is 40m x 40m (130ft x 130ft). The In the winter the ground conductivity is OK to good. How would you use this
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00352.html (7,371 bytes)

331. Re: Topband: Coax Shield vs. Ground & elevated radials (score: 116)
Author: Telegrapher9@aol.com
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:36:48 EST
Sinisa, I should have included some numbers to show the magnitude of the effectiveness of tuned shortened top band radials. To answer the point of Tom W8JI, for a 40 meter ground plane up 20' and hav
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00334.html (7,895 bytes)

332. Re: Topband: Coax Shield vs. Ground & elevated radials (score: 116)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:55:20 -0500
Maybe easy, but decoupling is still necessary if you want a clean and reliable installation. The notion a few 1/4 wl radials result in a perfectly unbalanced antenna is clearly false. A commercial 4
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00333.html (8,333 bytes)

333. Re: Topband: Radials, etc (score: 116)
Author: "Mike(W5UC) & Kathy(K5MWH)" <w5uc@suddenlink.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 07:09:56 -0600
Peter Good Morning: Let me look in my crystal ball and forecast your fate. In the Fall of 2005 I was frustrated by not being very competitive on 160. I went off to Lowe's and bought a thousand feet o
/archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00213.html (9,392 bytes)

334. Topband: Elevated Radials - W5UN's take (score: 116)
Author: W5UN <w5un@wt.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 19:16:44 +0000
I really did not plan to respond to this thread, but after seeing Charlies' comments, I thought I should share my experiences, as they may be of help to others here. In 2004 I constructed a 1/4 wl 80
/archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00046.html (9,347 bytes)

335. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials (score: 116)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 20:55:00 -0700
I have the same problem here, Ken. I think that would be an interesting case study. Keep the top of the vertical radiator fixed and then raise the base along with a fixed number of radials to see if
/archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00042.html (9,821 bytes)

336. Re: Topband: elevated radials (score: 116)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:27:44 -0500
Tom notes: After spending hours studying the graphs 9-14 through 9-19 in ON4UN's 4th ed, I fail to understand the significance if all the hoopla regarding the so-called "perfect" ground system. What
/archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00038.html (9,392 bytes)

337. Topband: elevated radials (score: 116)
Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 09:25:43 -0400
Following N4HY's admonition regarding Gustafson's (N7CL) work with elevated radials, I Googled him...and wound up in the reflector thread on this topic, back in '98. Still reading the exchanges...and
/archives//html/Topband/2006-08/msg00027.html (7,679 bytes)

338. Re: Topband: Tuning elevated radials (score: 116)
Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:05:08 -0500
Gary, and others... My thinking has been that the characteristic null that is supposed to occur at zenith is a good thing. If nearby QRN arrives at a high angle, then the deep null at zenith should b
/archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00038.html (10,202 bytes)

339. Re: Topband: Tuning elevated radials (score: 116)
Author: "K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:07:08 -0500
.... ___________________ Ford, You hit one of my "hot buttons" -- I have not seen any convincing evidence that equalizing currents in elevated radials is a valid exercise. Even if it is, the "soluti
/archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00037.html (8,924 bytes)

340. Re: Topband: Radials question. (score: 116)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 23:10:05 -0500
Magnus: circle Put down as many radials as long as you can make them in as many directions as you can. You won't fool the antenna, unless you install the radials at night when it can't see what you a
/archives//html/Topband/2004-11/msg00000.html (7,944 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu