Mail Archive Search: <ground radials>

Results:

References: [ ground (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ radials: 7738 ]

Total 7738 documents matching your query.

41. Topband: Ground Radials and an inv-L antenna (score: 161): Author: "Dennis Peterson" <dennisissure@comporium.net>; Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:19:33 -0400; Okay guys here's the latest scenario.............because the VSWR curve looks as it does and it was checked 5 times or more for accuracy, (see attachment) I decided to disconnect all the radials and; /archives//html/Topband/2009-09/msg00153.html (10,621 bytes)
42. Re: Topband: No radials on my 52' tall 1/4 wave INV-L /ARRL 160 Contest (score: 158): Author: W3HKK@roadrunner.com; Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2021 17:24:33 +0000; Saw the comments on adding radials, so I had to comment on my situation this year. I didnt get around to rolling out the 27 radials ( 30'-130' long depending on PL) yet, so I entered the ARRL 160 Con; /archives//html/Topband/2021-12/msg00012.html (22,378 bytes)
43. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials Questions (score: 158): Author: "ZR" <zr@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:51:27 -0500; The only place Ive found tuned elevated radials being discussed so much is on ham forums. A bit over 20 years ago I installed a slanted wire 1/4 wave vertical for 160 coming off the top guy wire of a; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00365.html (12,489 bytes)
44. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials Questions (score: 158): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:20:12 -0500; I also found the 2005 thread "tuning elevated radials" on this reflector quite informative. One thing that stands out is that I may be better off with more than 7 shorter than 130' radials. Note - if; /archives//html/Topband/2012-12/msg00360.html (11,149 bytes)
45. Re: Topband: Fence "ground screen" instead of wire radials? (score: 158): Author: Guy Olinger K2AV <olinger@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 10:38:41 -0400; Before tackling the last question, it needs to be pointed out that 60 evenly spaced 1/4 wave radials on the ground, and many (most) antenna wags would say that placing chicken wire should not make an; /archives//html/Topband/2011-09/msg00064.html (21,360 bytes)
46. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials (score: 155): Author: Frank W3LPL <donovanf@starpower.net>; Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 14:32:13 -0500 (EST); Hi Bob, That's a superb antenna farm you've grown in central Ohio! Congratulations! Your elevated systems of four radials would work even better with more radials. You can prove that to yourself by m; /archives//html/Topband/2024-01/msg00046.html (14,954 bytes)
47. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials (score: 155): Author: "Wes Attaway \(N5WA\)" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 11:39:19 -0600; When I first looked at Eddy's list I laughed. However, it does convey a clear message that there are a lot of ways to achieve the goal of a workable low-band vertical. I certainly won't argue with th; /archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00013.html (14,060 bytes)
48. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials (score: 155): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <jeff@ac0c.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 16:43:16 -0600; As Brad suggests, the article by N6LF in QEX debunks a ton of traditional lore. Especially regarding height above ground and length. That article seems THE place to start for anyone considering an el; /archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00004.html (12,760 bytes)
49. Re: Topband: Tuning elevated radials (score: 155): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 04:12:54 -0400; <<So what's the fix? It seems to me that the area underneath this vertical needs to be beefed up. Even though the tower insulators are about 10 degrees above the earth, should I consider attaching th; /archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00055.html (10,269 bytes)
50. TopBand: Elevated Radials (score: 155): Author: n7cl@sparx.mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 17:08:18 -0700; To: <topband@contesting.com> Snip... Jay, There seems to be a lot of confusion over the issue of elevated radials and vertical antenna ground system losses in general. To compound the problem, none o; /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00155.html (17,614 bytes)
51. Re: Topband: "Missing" Buried Radials for a Monopole (score: 152): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:04:25 -0400; A vertical will radiate without any ground, and actually radiate pretty well if the common mode feedline currents can be controlled and loading losses minimized. Radiation comes from charge accelera; /archives//html/Topband/2012-08/msg00291.html (12,221 bytes)
52. TopBand: Summary:Elevated Radials Part 2 (score: 152): Author: laurao@vcn.com (Laura Ostrem); Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 20:03:16 -0600; N6DX Darrell Hi Eric, Congratulations on your eloquent and informative response to Jay's pastural plea. As you state the "connection" loss can easily be eliminated with as few as two well balanced ra; /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00236.html (26,449 bytes)
53. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials (score: 149): Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 21:11:27 -0500; Hi. Richard I've been following this thread -mostly for entertainment. I've noted your postings re elevated radials to replace deteriorated buried radial fields under broadcast towers. I'm familiar w; /archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00039.html (12,959 bytes)
54. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials (score: 149): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 20:23:15 -0800; Tom, Great stuff! Could you elaborate on a couple of points - 1. I would think that a system with elevated radials that slope upward towards the far ends (e.g for 160m 10' at feedpoint and 30' at far; /archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00014.html (14,574 bytes)
55. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials (score: 149): Author: Brad Rehm <bradrehm@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:38:39 -0600; Eddy, If you haven't already, you might want to take a look at Rudy Severns' site (http://www.antennasbyn6lf.com/). A bit of reading will answer some or most of your questions. It's been a few years; /archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00001.html (11,200 bytes)
56. Re: Topband: Topband Digest, Vol 113, Issue 6 (score: 149): Author: Jim WA9YSD <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 06:57:54 -0700 (PDT); Keep in mind this Sole purpose of a BC station is to get coverage of about 60 miles running 5KW day time and 1 KW night time with no fad and quality signal not to work DX. I read in some posts or on; /archives//html/Topband/2012-05/msg00033.html (32,900 bytes)
57. Topband: Inverted L & radials=conclusion (score: 149): Author: cris blak <cyo3fff@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:47:17 -0700 (PDT); Hello all, First, thanks to all who answered for suggestions. As a conclusion, maybe to interest for further reading. INV. L is better than an INV. Vee for TXing. - the longer the vertical part, the; /archives//html/Topband/2007-03/msg00133.html (8,620 bytes)
58. TopBand: Re: Elevated Radials (score: 149): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h @ juno.com); Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 15:52:26 EST; So mail me the pertinent data and lets get it off the reflector. I will PAY ALL copy and mail costs. Here is NOT why ... who approved/requested that test configuration? The station owner, the consult; /archives//html/Topband/1998-03/msg00147.html (13,300 bytes)
59. TopBand: How many radials ? (score: 149): Author: n7cl@sparx.mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Sun, 20 Oct 1996 15:45:33 -0700; To: <topband@contesting.com> Snip... Snip... This is another very interesting empirical determination. Peter's perception of diminishing returns based on feedpoint impedance measurements came at a r; /archives//html/Topband/1996-10/msg00287.html (11,160 bytes)
60. Re: Topband: Elevated Radials (score: 146): Author: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 08:47:39 -0500; Good Day Again All, Well, I've done my best to summarize all the respondents' comments in the matter of elevated vs. ground-mounted radials--and I'll try now to summarize these in a single-page forma; /archives//html/Topband/2013-03/msg00011.html (11,480 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]