The mobile signal from WT9U on 20 meters was head and shoulders better than
any of the others I heard here in FL
It would be interesting to know why you were som much louder than the other
rolling stations.
Congratulations to ALL the MQP participants for enduring what had to be
nothing short of he** on the higher bands - condx dealt to you were pretty
stinko.
73,
Jim, K4OJ
----- Original Message -----
From: <webform@hornucopia.com>
To: <3830@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 1:28 PM
Subject: [3830] MiQP WT9U/M Mobile LP
> Michigan QSO Party
>
> Call: WT9U/M
> Operator(s): WT9U
> Station: WT9U/M
>
> Class: Mobile LP
> QTH: MI
> Operating Time (hrs): 11:30
>
> Summary:
> Band CW Qs Ph Qs
> --------------------
> 80: 4
> 40: 355 60
> 20: 171 63
> 15:
> 10:
> --------------------
> Total: 530 123 CW Mults = 58 Ph Mults = 48 Total Score = 124,974
>
> Club: Society of Midwest Contesters
>
> Comments:
>
> First time mobile contesting. Had my broadcast engineer friend driving
and his
> friend helping navagate/observe. Loads of fun. Pileup's in the evening
were
> great. Equipment was Yaesu FT757GX and hamsticks on magmounts, laptop
running
> TR Log (of course). This was the trial run for the Indiana QSO Party
coming up
> the first Saturday in May.
>
> 73...Jim, WT9U
>
>
> Posted using 3830 Score Submittal Forms at:
http://www.hornucopia.com/3830score/
> _______________________________________________
> 3830 mailing list
> 3830@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/3830
|