At 06:24 PM 12/11/97 EST, you wrote:
>
>On Thu, 11 Dec 1997 22:03:58 +0000 "Ian White, G3SEK"
><G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk> writes:
>>Rich Measures wrote:
>>>If the paper is unsigned, receiving a copy of it would
>>>not reveal the author.
>>
>>It doesn't matter which individuals first wrote the bulletin,
>>commented
>>on the draft, authorized its release and so on... You have to accept
>>that the statements in the Application Bulletin as published represent
>>the views of the EIMAC company.
>>
>>You can't try to pick-off and discredit individual EIMAC employees one
>>by one.
>
>
>
>A statement that needed to be made Ian.....Thanks.
>
>73 CArl KM1H
Huh? Are you saying that if there is a legitimate reason to question a
statement that we should suspend our skepticism and accept it at face value
because it was made on the letterhead of a major tube manufacturer????
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|