At 10:41 AM 4/28/97 +0000, you wrote:
>
>ALC will not cure the problem, because ALC is traditionally too slow
>to limit leading edges of waveforms.
Just a little communications problem here...a fixed, adjustable external
ALC supply will cut the exciter back and keep it there.
>
>Be sure you apply that current rating correctly. On lower
>frequencies current is determined by the I*X voltage drop
>across the component and the voltage drop across the component. On
>160, you are well within the rating of the component. The 1.6 amperes
>does NOT indicate the capacitor is close to HEAT failure from
>excessive current, al low frequencies the current rating indicates
>the point of arcing from VOLTAGE failure.
The 1.6 ampre rating @ 1 mhz is the maximum allowable current to maintain
the N750 temperature coefficient rating. Drift goes to pot above this #.
The 1000 pf doorknob in the Alpha 77DX worked fine. In the SX, you need
to replace it with 2-500 pf units to stop the drift problem on 160m.
>Drift problems are a different issue. Drift problems have come and
>gone with ceramic doorknobs. HEC's capacitors were originally quite
>stable, while ITT Jennings caps were very poor. When HEC bought out
>ITT, HEC's stability went to hell.
I hope they get their act together soon, as they are just about the only
game left in town! Prices, by the way, are through the roof!
>> This simulation may be of value during initial design, but when you
>> put the power to the circuit, strange and different things begin to
>> happen. In a Pi-L circuit the weakest and most vulnerable point is
>> the band switch, In a Pi network, it is the tune cap
Communications problem again...what I am saying is that the spark on a
Tesla coil is a little more robust @ 1500 watts input than it is @ 1 watt.
>Other than the slightly higher voltage across the loading
>capacitor, the pi-L is no more likely to produce high voltages
>anywhere in the tank system than the pi.
Not likely, but possible...been there, done that!
>Virtually all PA's short unused turns. Turns often need to be
>shorted to prevent unwanted voltages from building up when operating
>on higher bands.
I agree totally, but show me ONE article in any Bill Orr Handbook, or
ARRL handbook that specifies a shorting type band switch! I'll save you
the trouble, there are none. This is a costly oversight!
>On a 80 through ten meter tank, the designer might get by without
>shorting unused turns, but he likely won't get away with it on a
>160 through ten PA.
I believe I stated that...I am here to tell everyone you will not get
away with it in most cases.
>> In the pi-section of a Pi-L network, the voltages on the Pi coil from
>> end-to-end are actually higher than in an equivalent strait Pi network.
>
>Not necessarily. It depends on phase shift in the network. In most
>design cases, phase shift is less making end to end voltage less.
>Traditionally pi-L's operate at slightly less Q in the pi-section
>that conventional pi's.
A design Q of "X" is a design Q of "X"...in ANY network. The voltages
in a Pi-L might not necessarily be higher, but they can be, at least
in my case.
>In any event, the problem was indicated to be voltage breakdown to
>ground..... not end to end across the switch.
That is correct. The rotor remained unharmed in all cases.
>But I can say one thing for sure, the reason was
>almost certainly not due to the network being a pi-L...unless the
>pi-L caused a loading capacitor or rotor to ground arc.
The reason was the Pi-L was hooked to a band switch that did not have
shorting provisions; just like the Handbooks show!
>No matter what the cause of this particular problem, I'd hate to
>see people dismiss pi-L's as "arc prone" systems.
Pi-L's are very arc prone if you do not short the unused turns. If you
short them, no problem! Build your amp from a schematic from Alpha,
Ameritron, Command, or QSK; not Bill Orr or ARRL, and you will do fine!
(((73)))
Phil, K5PC
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|