Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: Heath sb200/201 amplifiers

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: Heath sb200/201 amplifiers
From: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 00:47:33 +0000
To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Date:          Mon, 4 Aug 97 22:43:55 +0000
> X-To:          boatanchors <boatanchors@theporch.com>

> Does any one know the reason why Heath would chose to float the grids
> above
> ground on the 500z tubes.

That was suggested as a method of adding negative feedback to the 
tube. It was done without proper measurement, and proved to be a bad 
idea.  

> they are bypassed for rf thru a couple of chokes
> and capacitors, it seems to me it would make more sence to ground them
> directley to the chassis, for better isolation and stability.

Your gut instinct is correct, it decreases grid isolation and reduces 
stability. At the same time it creates phase shift problems as drive 
and tuning is changed.

Some people claim it "series tunes the grid", but if you look at the 
values used the capacitors only reduce feedback in a very narrow 
range between 30 and 60 MHz, depending on layout and lead length.

At the frequency where the tubes tend to take-off, 100 to 200 MHz, 
the longer leads actually INCREASE grid impedance. If you look at 
lower HF where we want good input to output isolation, the caps 
greatly decrease the isolation. 

You can measure this effect with a transmission loss function on a 
network analyzer, and I've done just that. You can also measure it 
with a signal source like a MFJ-259 and a RF detector.

Grounding the grids directly to the chassis through lugs right near 
the socket tabs will actually allow you to remove turns from the VHF 
suppressor with no loss in stability, and improve IMD performance.

73, Tom W8JI 

(My opinions are my own. I am an independent consultant for several 
manufacturers and government agencies. I have no vested interest or control 
beyond supplying data and making suggestions. I do receive royalties tied to 
the sales or use of certain paten
ted RF 
medical devices.)

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [AMPS] Re: Heath sb200/201 amplifiers, w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net <=