Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: Parasitics

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: Parasitics
From: James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil (James.E.Brown@LRD03.usace.army.mil)
Date: 24 Apr 1998 16:46:36 Z
on 4/24/98 jono@webspun.com wrote:

...Tom Rauch has resorted to personal insults t defend his position.
So IMHO, he doesn't have a lot of credibility.  This regardless of how
right he may be.


I've followed every post on this reflector since it started.  You have
the wrong guy pegged for personal insults.  Mr. Rauch railed and
pleaded time and again for professional discussions rather than
degeneration into personal attacks -- even after he was the target of a
number of them made public to all recipients.  And he did not
respond in kind.  Don't take someone's word for a negative on Mr.
Rauch.  A thorough reading of the archives will show differently.  He
does not seem to take part in this reflector now, but I have seen
current postings from him on other reflectors, and his advice is still
top notch IMO.

BTW, KE9NA seems to divorce "right" and "credibility" on the basis of
something totally unrelated.  There seems to be a logical disconnect
there.

Jim     W4LC

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>