To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] parasitics |
From: | amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson) |
Date: | Tue, 28 Apr 1998 08:07:24 +0100 |
In message <F2B87FD6828AD11196F100A0C9410EC2617D73@excalibur.swindon.msl .mitel.com>, Peter Chadwick <Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com> writes > >2. just because there's a VHF resonance doesn't mean that there will be a >parasitic oscillation. There has to be feedback and gain. > And, if there's a parasitic oscillation, it doesn't mean there is a resonance (or that the oscillation is occurring at any resonant frequency if there is one). All it needs is the load on the active device to have the necessary magnitude and phase (resistive and reactive components). It's more likely to happen at a resonant frequency because the phase spins around a lot and you are more likely to hit the angle for oscillation. Steve PS talking of puns, I think someone mentioned the 'grate' parasitic debate - perhaps a reference to how it seems to grate on some people? -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] Suppressor Measurements, Jon Ogden |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] SB-221 Suppresion on 10 Meters, Rich Measures |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] parasitics, Peter Chadwick |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] parasitics, Rich Measures |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |