[AMPS] Re: Parasitics

[G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK)]

Jon Ogden wrote:

>>But here we go again...
>>
>>0. This is a demonstration of an impedance transformation effect, so
>>we're going to assume ideal component behavior.
>
>Ok, thanks for this one.  Now I understand, Ian.  Ignore my last one.

Not quite sure which was the last one (my mail software shows list
messages in subject relationship) so please nudge me if I seem to have
ignored the wrong one!

>  I 
>hadn't sat down and worked the math.  Shame on me.

 ...but it wasn't you who had imperiously ordered me to produce the
math.

>I appreciate the time you took to show all that.  I see what you are 
>saying now.  It makes sense too.

No problem - you're open-minded enough to recognize proof when you see
it.


73 from Ian G3SEK          Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book'
                          'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
                           http://www.ifwtech.demon.co.uk/g3sek

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm