To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 19:06:18 -0700
> From: Radiodan W7RF <RFpower@radiodan.com>
> Subject: [AMPS] Bird 2500H dozen slug test
> To: "[AMPS] submissions" <amps@contesting.com>
> Hi guys,
>
> I was curious about relative BIRD wattmeter slug accuracy
Bird publishes tolerances measured against a caloric standard.
How do your results compare to their + or - 5% of full scale anywhere
on the scale for slugs and a model 43?
I've found only a few out of tolerance, but by far most fit ratings
OK, when compared to a caloric standard.
It's amazing how poor meters can be, when you use the slug far down
on the scale.
73, Tom W8JI
w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|