Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] 3CX800

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] 3CX800
From: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 22:30:17 +0100
In message <01BDBA6E.EEA98D60@166-93-76-122.rmi.net>, Richard W. Ehrhorn
<w4eto@rmii.com> writes
>Hi Steve and all...
>
>It's my understanding that an "electron cloud" forms around the cathode 
>whenever the current drawn from it is less than its emissive capability. 
>This negatively-charged cloud effectively protects the rather delicate 
>cathode oxide coating from the potentially strong anode-cathode electric 
>field.
>
>When very short (from usecs to a very few msecs), high-amplitude pulses of 
>cathode current are drawn, the electrons can be drawn from the cloud - up 
>to a point. The shorter the pulse duration, the higher the current that can 
>be drawn, and conversely.
>
>If high-enough cathode current is drawn for long enough to fully deplete 
>the electron cloud, the electric field at the cathode surface may and does 
>reach an intensity that can literally pull chunks (flakes?) of oxide off 
>the cathode, not only damaging it & reducing its emissivity but potentially 
>contaminating the grid sufficiently to destroy the tube's usefulness.
>
>I think this scenario pretty much answers your questions, Steve. But my 
>info dates back many years, and if anyone on the reflector can confirm, 
>refine, correct, and/or contradict it on the basis of currently-credible 
>sources, I'd very much like to see such info.
>
>73,    Dick   W0ID

Marvellous, thanks, Dick; you also answer the (unasked) follow-up
question about running higher anode voltage.

Steve

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>