Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] 3cx3000a7 versus 4cx15000

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] 3cx3000a7 versus 4cx15000
From: aa7bg@3rivers.net (Matt--K7BG)
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 1998 23:33:27 -0600
>Since the last figure of 150,000 watts is impossible except for
>meglomaniac millionares, for the average person wanting to come close
>to these super amps, the 3cx3000a7 delivers, albeit with 400 watts
>drive. Also building a power supply can be achieved very simply with
>an existing plate transformer and doubler, most parts at the required
>voltage are more readily available. Secondly i think the 3000 new is
>bargain, the warranty is fantastic, it would be cheaper to build with
>a 3000 rather than multiple 4cx1600 or 8877s, and look at the grid
>dissapation, drive it with 100 and it will last a life time! I have
>access to many surplus russian 8281s hence i am building with what i
>have, if was in the states i think i would use the 3000.

I believe Bill Clinton is the only one running this much power stateside.

73, Matt--K7BG


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>