Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] More off subject about CW

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] More off subject about CW
From: andywallace@home.com (Andy Wallace)
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 12:29:10 -0600


km1h@juno.com wrote:

> On Sun, 31 Jan 1999 09:10:43 -0600 Andy Wallace <andywallace@home.com>
> writes:
> >Carl--
> >
> >Guess what? My 40 antenna has a rotator on it. 40 CW was VERY quiet
> >around 5PM
> >Central yesterday--plenty of bandspace available and the other ham
> >bands had
> >very little CW activity as well.
>
> >Andy  K5VM
>
> Hmmm,
>
> And what was the WWV report ?
> What is your 40M antenna and height?
>

Good enough to easily work East Malaysia

> Or did you consider that this is the CQ 160M CW weekend? There wasnt very
> much space to fit another signal.

What in the world does this mean? Are you suggesting all CW operators are on
160? nonsense!

>
>
> 73  Carl  KM1H
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
> or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm




--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>