Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: Cantenna

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: Cantenna
From: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe)
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 15:35:02 -0600
Nope,

It can absorb more calories with less temp increase to the water than any
other substance. Only thing better than tap water is heavy water, but that's
still water.

Roy    K6XK


-----Original Message-----
From: Gilmer, Mike <mgilmer@gnlp.com>
To: 'Roy Koeppe' <royanjoy@ncn.net>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Date: Wednesday, February 03, 1999 3:28 PM
Subject: RE: [AMPS] Re: Cantenna


>Roy -
>I think what you're saying (and I agree) is that water is good at
>exchanging heat rather than at holding heat.  That's why one needs
>antifreeze, which "holds" its heat and doesn't freeze but why it's NOT a
>good idea to run pure antifreeze - it's poor at removing the heat from
>the engine.
>73
>
>Mike N2MG
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Roy Koeppe [SMTP:royanjoy@ncn.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 1999 4:11 PM
>> To: amps@contesting.com
>> Subject: [AMPS] Re: Cantenna
>>
>> Don't you gents remember your physics? Water absorbs more heat per
>> given volume than any other substance. It's a much better coolant than
>> oil. It's just "corrosive" to radio components is the problem.
>>
>> K6XK
>


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>