Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: Tuned Input for Clipperton

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: Tuned Input for Clipperton
From: wlfuqu00@pop.uky.edu (William L. Fuqua III)
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:01:33 -0500 (EST)
  I did fail to point out that it could be that NPO's are 
more desireable because they are usually physically larger
than the cheaper caps.
73
Bill
>    Why NPO?    With Q=2  Bandwidth (-3db) of the tuned circuit
>is F/Q = .5*F or 50% 
>10% change in capacitance would only produce 5% shift in frequency.
>   One advantage in using higher voltage capacitors is that they are
>physically larger and can handle more RF current due to the larger
>surface area. 
>
>
>73
>Bill wa4lav
>  
>

  William L. Fuqua III  P.E.  E-mail WLFUQU00@POP.UKY.EDU  Phone (606) 257-4155
  Department of Physics and Astronomy      CP-177 Chem. Phys. Bldg.  
  University of Kentucky ,                 Lexington, Ky 40506-0055
 
  


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>