Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Fwd: [HeathKit] Amps, solid state fixes, better tubes....

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Fwd: [HeathKit] Amps, solid state fixes, better tubes....
From: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 99 13:49:11 -0500
This was forwarded from the Heath list.  Thought someone here might be 
able to help.

73,

Jon
KE9NA

---------------- Begin Forwarded Message ----------------
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Date:        04/06  12:18
Received:    04/06  13:47
From:        Doug_Hensley@generalhealth.org
To:          heathkit@qth.net
             HEATH@LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV

Keepers of the Green and Proud,

I am getting my first real experiences with Heath amps 
and have both the SB-200 and Warrior.  Can someone summarize for me and 
the list
one more time the advantage/disadvantage of using ss rectifier subs and 
the
newer 572B power tubes in place of the 811A's particularly for the 
Warrior?  As
the high-voltage is in-
creased, doesn't the current demand of the final's go down and doesn't 
that
reduce the likelihood of xmfr failure?  Or am I all wrong?

I know, I know...I should have been paying attention.  

73 to all.


---
Submissions heathkit@qth.net


----------------- End Forwarded Message -----------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Ogden

jono@enteract.com
www.qsl.net/ke9na

"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [AMPS] Fwd: [HeathKit] Amps, solid state fixes, better tubes...., Jon Ogden <=