| To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [AMPS] cavity parasitic suppressors |
| From: | Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick) |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Jun 1999 11:14:31 +0100 |
John says: >With the new suppressor, the parasitic never started up, so it was a >"chicken and egg" problem, the suppressor was actually parasitic birth >control. Forgive my naivety, but isn't this what all parasitic suppressors are supposed to do? 73 Peter G3RZP -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [AMPS] 3CX800, Peter Chadwick |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [AMPS] New World Record for 8877 Replacement, Thomas Cook |
| Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] cavity parasitic suppressors, John T. M. Lyles |
| Next by Thread: | [AMPS] New World Record for 8877 Replacement, Rich Measures |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |