Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: Elementary question...(Shame)

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: Elementary question...(Shame)
From: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe)
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 14:18:42 -0600
Phil, thanks for the following:

"A roller coil gives the advantage of being able to tune the tank
for maximum efficiency at any power setting and frees one from many
hours of tapping a fixed coil in place in a new amp.

It is very simple; you tune the tank circuit for maximum power output.
With a roller coil, you just have one more item to tune.

Antenna tuners with roller coils work the same way. A tapped coil
may not be close enough to give a perfect match in every case."

(((73)))
Phil, K5PC

BUT,

Couldn't (wouldn't)  maximum output likely correspond to a rather low-Q
setting of L1, rather than the usual 10 or 12?  With a high L to C ratio
in the pi-net, efficiency is improved at the expense of harmonic
attenuation (low, loaded tank Q).

So, it seems to me, just tuning all three components for maximum,  full
bore output, could end a person up with an undesireable loaded Q tank
situation.

Other comments please. (My danged ISP dumped all my e-mail, so I had to
retrieve the responses from the archives after I realized what  had
happened--and the ISP admitted to it--sorry for the delay).

73,     Roy      K6XK               Iowa




--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>