[snip]
>From: Colin
>...I do not know that the G2DAF design is good or bad, and I would
>not use it on the air without testing, what I am objecting to is the
>thought process and testing procedures of Rich. They are flawed.
how..?
>His assertions and conclusions may be correct - but not for all the
>reasons stated.
Let me tell you about my testing procedures for Norm's DAF
amplifier. During a casual conversation with a weak, out of state
mobile on 7255 lsb, very heavy spectral buckshot from an operator in
conversation on 7258 lsb would cover the mobile's signal.
A quick dial up the band would find Norm as the source of the
buckshot among the 10 or so other operators. After Norm turned
the amplifier off, I could resume my conversation with the mobile 3KHz
down the band.
I've not been bothered by Norms amplifier in some time now, probably
because I've since learned it'd been modified to use a fixed screen
potential.
In case it was never mentioned, Norms amplifier used dual 4cx250s. I
have a copy of the screen control circuit he used. Quite the interesting
animal.
>And, I do find it somewhat disheartening to have a design from a
>respected tube engineer (G2DAF) rejected because it
>is misunderstood and as a result of a flawed investigation.
Provide me with evidence the daf circuit operates within reasonable
values,
I'll consider using it. So far the applied example on 7258 could be heard
quite well down 3KHz, far above the operators using tubes with handles
in their amplifiers.
Since the screens were fixed, the buckshot went away.
cheers
skipp
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|