>
>measures wrote:
>
>>>** to the Crybabies are still awake: -- is this boring or what?
>>>Remember the good times when you could drop ol' Rich a note to
>>>remove you from the AMPS-bypass mailer?
>>>
>>>
>>>Peter -- hows about trading a few moderately stupid insults
>>>to wake 'em up?
>
>No bloody way! Finally, a technical discussion is ensuing that makes
>progress. Once the insults fly, the learning ceases.
Surely this is the case with over the top insults. However, by limiting
insults to moderately-stupid ones, Peter and yours truly could have
easily picked up and slogged on.
> Now, if only such
>progress could be made on a discussion relating more directly to high-power
>RF. Not that this discussion is irrelevant to amps; I just happen to know
>everything that I need to about the present topic.
>
congrats
>By some manner of legerdemain, I have managed to avoid being on the
>AMPS-bypass mailer.
Some of the addresses proved to be a bit bouncey. With the simply-awful
AMPS=bypass mail server, everyone had the freedom of choice of not seeing
what I post. Presumably, the AMPS server is now "mail-bombing" and
"spamming" the kvetchers. .
>
cheers, Fred
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|