Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Is screen potential important?

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Is screen potential important?
From: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 08:27:50 -0700
>
>Rich said:
>
>"Not until the screen bypass C becomes sufficiently charged.  Another
>problem is keeping the screen bypass C from mostly discharging on soft
>syllables."
>
>Rich, this is not a problem, except for you.  It results in the Norm
>version.  

There were several versions.  

>Just as you want the screen to charge immediately, you want it to
>discharge immediately.

The screen bypass C should have equal charge and discharge time 
constants.  // I do not want to charge/discharge the screen bypass.  
>
>If the screen remains charged, the next loud syllable would have screen
>voltage too great for the drive - resulting in greater amplification which
>could produce distortion.

 So shouting in the microphone could actually wipe out the screen?  Whew. 
How is it that the exciter is capable of such a thing?
>
>Rich then said:
>
>"This is where Thornley seemingly derailed."
>
>In fact, this is where Measures seemingly derailed.
>
Declare victory.  Some might buy it.   

cheers, Colin

-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>