Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] RF filament choke for indirectly heated cathodes?

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] RF filament choke for indirectly heated cathodes?
From: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 09:28:25 -0700
>
>Dave,
>
>You wrote:
><quote>
>
>Mauri,
>Perhaps you have some difficulty with the English language, but what you
>have expressed above is non-sequitor.  You say.....
>?Most of those suppressors are actually not working at all, and finally
>they aren?t anything better than no suppressors at all.
>Last but not least, when suppressors resistors are cracked (typical)
>oscillation risks are increased.?
>
>If the resistor/coil combination Really Isn?t working AT ALL or is no
>better than no supressor at all (ineffective), how can a cracked
>resistor increase oscillation risks?

?  Even if a L/R parasite suppressor is poorly designed, it decreases VHF 
gain at the anode-resonant freq. compared to no suppressor at all.  //  A 
cracked resistor would seem likely to increase VHF gain.  

cheers, Dave

><end quote>
>
>Perhaps because no suppressor at all is better than a series coil
>without damping resistor ??
>
>In my view, Mauri has excellent command of the English language. I would
>venture to say, better than some native speakers on this reflector. But
>then, I'm no native speaker either..:-) By the way, if I recall
>correctly from my Latin class, it's "non-sequitur".
>
correct, Mike

-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>