>
>you want one- OK- You claim Tom does not understand certain mathematic
>notations-
Tom said he did not understand how e2/e1^23.4 was derived from the info
on thoriated tungsten emission life in Care and Feeding.
> two- your insulting mistranslation of word associations about
>the word 'rauch'.
I have heard this from those who know him. I have seen numerous suspect
posts. .
>with a little search I could find a couple more- Oh- how about the one in
>this post- that Tom says AC anlysis in not valid?
This is what he says in the archive.
>
cheers, Bill
>
>At 04:11 PM 9/6/00 -0700, you wrote:
>>>Rich- I NEVER make a determination from a statement taken out of context-
>>
>>You can read this one in Wil's archive to see as much context as you
>>like. Tom's position was that virtually no current flows in L-supp.
>>According to AC circuit analysis, for the values at hand, roughly half of
>>the current flowed in L-supp.
>>
>>>especially when it is given by a suspect source. I have seen several
>>>statements from you, about Tom, that I know to be distortions or false to
>>>fact.
>>
>>How about a sample for the group's perusal?
>>
>>cheers, Bill
>>>
>>>At 01:33 PM 9/6/00 -0700, you wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Tom- it does NOT take an EE to detect the bias. My professional specialty
>>>>>was Rocket motors, with only enough electronics exposure to 'appliance
>>>>>operate' good instruments, but my second specialty (used professionally,
>>>>>too) was the detection and analysis of verbal BS. ......
>>>>>
>>>>The BS-detector test -- During the Grate debate, when it was revealed
>>>>that AC circuit analysis disproved one of Mr. Rauch's assertions, he
>>>>claimed that AC circuit analysis is not valid for L/R parasitic
>>>>suppressors. Bill, in your opinion, is AC circuit analysis not valid
>>>>for parasitic suppressors?
>>>>
>>>>thanks
>>>>
>>>>- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
>>>>end
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>>>>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>>>>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>>>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>-
>>>Bill Aycock --- Persimmon Hill
>>> Woodville, Alabama, US 35776
>>> (in the N.E. corner of the State)
>>> W4BSG -- Grid EM64vr
>>> baycock@HiWAAY.net
>>> w4bsg@arrl.net
>>>
>>
>>
>>- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
>>end
>>
>>
>-
>Bill Aycock --- Persimmon Hill
> Woodville, Alabama, US 35776
> (in the N.E. corner of the State)
> W4BSG -- Grid EM64vr
> baycock@HiWAAY.net
> w4bsg@arrl.net
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>
>
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|