[AMPS] Logic v. Magic

Amps

[AMPS] Logic v. Magic

To:	<amps@contesting.com>
Subject:	[AMPS] Logic v. Magic
From:	rfamps@ic24.net (Steve Thompson)
Date:	Tue, 12 Sep 2000 16:29:31 -0700


-----Original Message-----
From: Ian White, G3SEK <G3SEK@ifwtech.com>
To: amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Date: 12 September 2000 07:17
Subject: [AMPS] Logic v. Magic
snip
>Until I got down and crunched the numbers, I hadn't fully realised that
>the value of the suppressor Q is literally *useless*.

I came to that conclusion.

Steve




--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[AMPS] Logic v. Magic, measures [AMPS] Logic v. Magic, measures [AMPS] Logic v. Magic, Steve Thompson <= [AMPS] Q is meaningless, Tom Rauch [AMPS] Logic v. Magic, Steve Thompson [AMPS] Logic v. Magic, measures [AMPS] Logic v. Magic, Steve Thompson [AMPS] Logic v. Magic, <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK) [AMPS] Logic v. Magic, measures [AMPS] Logic v. Magic, measures

Previous by Date:	[AMPS] Grid protection, Tom Rauch
Next by Date:	[AMPS] temperature variable, varistor or globar resistor source wanted, Steve Thompson
Previous by Thread:	[AMPS] Logic v. Magic, measures
Next by Thread:	[AMPS] Q is meaningless, Tom Rauch
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]