>
>Here's a good example of what drags this out so long:
>
>Subject: RE: [AMPS] Blown TL922A... What to do?
>Date sent: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 18:34:10 -0700
>From: measures <2@vc.net>
>To: "AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>
>
>>
>> > My electronics instructor used to say often the problems with a
>> > circuit
>> >is the component you can't see. Especially with RF circuits.
>> >
>> Amen to that, Bill. Who would ever have guessed that there is a
>> Z-step-up L-network hidden inside the Tune-C in a 922?
>
>Well, there ISN'T a "Z-step-up L-Network" hidden in the tuning cap
>of a TL-922 that I'm aware of.
>
perhaps
>I measured a tuning cap for the AL-80A, and found the impedance
>crossed nearly zero in a smooth curve at upper VHF/lower UHF,
>and Rich tried to change that to a TL922 and make the impedance
>curve different!
What about the series-resonance you reportedly found below 200MHz?
>
>The reply Rich posted is an example why measurements won't
>solve this argument.
? (Wes' measurements were embarrassments)
>I'm of the opinion this is a time-wasting
>exercise, because anything anyone measures will be modified by
>Rich to fit his needs, just like the measurements N7WS made.
>
? I quoted Wes' measurements accurately. On the day that Wes published
his measurements, there was reportedly hours and hours of cryptic
diatribe on 1850KHz.
>N7WS made independent measurements, reached the same
>conclusion I had reached years earlier, and Rich modified the
>results.
? Some men tell the truth and some don't.
>When that happens over and over again, it is impossible to
>resolve anything.
>
? my guess is that yet another exit is about to occur.
>
end
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|