Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: Max-"CON"

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: Max-"CON"
From: 2@vc.net (measures)
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 16:42:27 -0800
>I think you intended this post for the antennas reflector.
>
>But as I recall the principle of the Max-com antenna, it was just a 
>broad-banded, RF step up transformer, from 52 ohms to around 500 ohms.
>
>The secondary had a 500 ohm resistor across it. In parallel with that 
>resistor was the center of a dipole antenna.
>
>Depending on frequency, efficiency could be as low a a very few percent.
>
It is a Max Con.         

cheers, Roy 

-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>