My point was: "is it worth the effort to replace a rough but simple
resistor with a more complex circuit using of active and passive
components ?"
73
Mauri I4JMY
> ---------- Initial message -----------
>
> From : measures <2@vc.net>
> To : "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>, "AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>
> Cc :
> Date : Tue, 28 Nov 2000 07:22:40 -0800
> Subject : Re: SV: [AMPS] SB-220 Glitch Resistor ???
>
> >
> >Statistically, the overall reliability is also an inverse function
of
> >the number of components used.
> >The point if adopting some newer and more complex circuit, other
than
> >for didactical purposes, should always be related to the evaluation
of
> >the real advantages gained.
> >
> Omitting the glitch resistor is like going boating with no life
jacket.
>
> cheers, Mauri
>
>
> - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
> end
>
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|