To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] Voltage Doublers |
From: | Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK) |
Date: | Wed, 16 May 2001 19:38:49 +0100 |
I just wrote: >I'd still guess that truly equivalent transformers - ones that gave >exactly the same voltage regulation - would come out very similar in >size, and the FWB one would be significantly lighter because it would >have to use much more copper (half the turns but much more than twice >the cross-section). Sorry - what I meant was, "the FW*D* one would be significantly *heavier* because..." 73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.com/g3sek -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] Voltage Doublers, Stephen Goldberg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] EER Amplifier Technique, Radio WC6W |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] Voltage Doublers, <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK) |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] Voltage Doublers, 2 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |