Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: [Drake] L4B power output

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: [Drake] L4B power output
From: bjk@ihug.co.nz (Barry Kirkwood)
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 08:12:33 +1200
Agree on the 220V.
The Drake power supply is a bit feeble.
A more rugged power supply will give significantly more output with no
problems, but most important of all, if it has good regulation will give
lower distortion products.
More signal with less crud.
Has to be a plus.
73
end
Barry Kirkwood PhD ZL1DD
Signal Hill Homestay
66 Cory Road
Palm Beach
Waiheke Island 1240
NEW ZEALAND
www.waiheke.co.nz/signal.htm
----- Original Message -----
From: 2 <2@vc.net>
To: chuck <k8cpa@arrl.net>; AMPS <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, 23 August, 2001 2:58 AM
Subject: Re: [AMPS] Re: [Drake] L4B power output


>
> >
> >At 12:42 AM 8/17/2001 -0300, you wrote:
> >>Does anyone know the L4B power output? Please consider  the L4B with
new
> >>3-500z's  and set to 120v.
> >>
> >>73 Carlos
> >>
> >
> >about 800 watts to a KW depending on drive. my advice get it on 220vdc.
> >
> This could damage the power supply.
>
> -  R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures.
> end
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>
>



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>