Why can hams not totally disagree with each other and still be totally
friendly? Someone said that you don't have to open every email in a thread
but if you do not, then there is no reason for having a thread. That is what
makes this reflector so nice is that you can discuss things. If you cannot
open every thread then that ends the discussion.
Why should things become personal when they can be kept on a technical level
even if there is major disagreement. I have argued topics on this list nad
haven't "come to blows with anyone.
Billy Dean Ward
Moderator of RF_Intensive_Study_Group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RF_Intensive_Study_Group
>From: "K0PZ" <K0PZ@MHO.COM>
>To: "amps refectol" <amps@contesting.com>
>Subject: RE: [AMPS] Nobody needs to go!
To: <amps@contesting.com>
>Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 15:01:10 -0600
>
>
>No one needs to go.
>
>There are a lot of opinionated persons on this reflector.
>They have many different views of the same subject or problem.
>NO one is always right. That's just life.
>The one most important thing about the different views expressed here,
>is they inspire research. When very different views are expressed
>about a common subject, then I do some research on my own.
>I have learned a lot from this group. I have also relearned a few
>things that I forgot. Treat this forum just like life, sift through
>the B/S and learn from others. Share your knowledge with others.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Robert J Smith KOPZ
>
>kOpz@mho.com
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|