Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Amp Drive Power(Long)

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Amp Drive Power(Long)
From: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 09:33:51 -0400
> - change of impedance over drive cycle

The best way to look at this is with harmonic content required to 
make a wave some shape other than a sine wave. The waveform 
MUST have harmonics of the drive frequency to change waveshape 
during a fraction of an RF cycle, because the required frequencies 
to modify the sine wave in such a small time interval are at least 
two times the drive frequency. 

If there is significant attenuation of signals at two times the drive 
frequency, you can be absolutely sure anything happening at the 
cathode is unimportant

What confuses people is they look at the change in drive 
impedance with drive level and assume this affects the fractional 
RF-cycle impedance. It does not, if the input has almost any Q at 
all and is a low pass network.

> Its precisely these sort of things which cause me to prefer Tetrode
> amps which are grid driven (esp. at VHF) - even then I like a 6dB pad
> on the input of the amp.

Because of the lack of inherent negative feedback, many practical 
tetrode amplifiers are not nearly as clean as a cathode driven 
system. 

The high amount of feedback also moderates the SWR. For 
example the input SWR on my AL1200 is 1.15 : 1 at 1 watt and 
only changes to 1.00 at 200 watts of RF drive.

What may confuse people is if you vary the loading control or plate 
tuning, the input SWR changes a noticeable amount. This is 
especially true in higher gain cathode driven stages. 

It was a bit of advertising fluff by a tetrode marketing department 
that mostly touted the "tetrode" advantage. That was ironic, since 
at the same time the same marketing people thought grids could 
be largely unregulated based on over-the-air "am I splattering much 
Herbie?" measurements.   

IMD measurements show how dirty most tetrode amps commonly 
used actually are.

> For your amp you might like to try a 1/2-wave length of coax between
> rig and radio on the band of interest [test] (taking velocity factor
> into account) to eliminate the "transform effect" of the coax from the
> equation.

Having a certain length of cable in fractions of a wavelength 
guarantees nothing, except how far away the PA can be physically 
placed.

Just make sure the amplifier is matched to the cable impedance. 
The normal range of 50 ohm cables I have measured is 45-55 ohms.
73, Tom W8JI
W8JI@contesting.com 

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>