>
>On this subject (which has substantially deviated from pairs of 572Bs,
>somehow), I have purchased both Kenwood and INRAD 1.8 kHz filters and
>sincerely regret all the above. The slope tuning, IF shift, passband tuning
>(or whatever your particular receiver happens to have) is far more effective
>at eliminating adjacent frequency QRM (and allowing the AGC to work normally
>and not be pumped by that strong offending signal) than using narrower
>filters. I absolutely hate the sound of the 1.8 kHz filters made by anyone,
>used in anything. As I grow older, I think I hate it even more.
>
? Amen to that. Tighter may be better for some things - but voice
bandwidth is not one of them.
cheers
- R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|