Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] SB-220

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] SB-220
From: 2@mail.vcnet.com (Rich...)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:25:30 -0800


>Rich,
>
>Haven't tried the 50 wpm approach. Is it because it's easier on the tube(s)?
>
?  Yes, and it allows an accurate tuneup with a power supply that won't 
maintain anode supply  V with AØ.

cheers, Paul

-  R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734,AG6K, 
www.vcnet.com/measures.  
end


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>