Amps
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

[Amps] 73 Iàmaybe too much charcol loose

from [donii@sympatico.ca] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: AMPS@CONTESTING.COM
Subject: [Amps] 73 Iàmaybe too much charcol loose
From: "donii@sympatico.ca" <donii@sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:04:23 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Hal
I'm mot sure if I got your drift in your last posting. According to you, using 73's in an email is 'out of place'?
My charcoal is still solid enough for an explanation.
Best regards
Peter Wells
VE2FAR


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Amps] Re: Step-start calculation..., R . Measures
Next by Date:  Re: [Amps] 73 Iàmaybe too much charcol loose, carl seyersdahl
Previous by Thread:  [Amps] Re: Step-start calculation..., Roy Koeppe
Next by Thread:  Re: [Amps] 73 Iàmaybe too much charcol loose, carl seyersdahl
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]