In a message dated 2/24/2005 9:14:02 A.M. Central Standard Time,
dajs@accnorwalk.com writes:
The main point of my post was the ruggedness and reliability of the
3CX1200A7 tube in the AL-1200. It has one of the lowest failure rates of any
transmitting tube made by Eimac. The 8877, in contrast, is much more delicate
and
has a history of premature failures.
Just look in the shacks of the major contest stations and see the number of
AL-1200's used versus the AL-1500.
I have owned and operated both of these fine amplifiers. Choosing one over
the other is not a clear and easy choice. In general, using the AL1200 in a
contest situation, it is an easier unit to QSY. The AL1500 tuning is a bit more
fussy due to the lower grid current and trip circuit. It is fairly common to
have to reset the grid trip time or two in the tune up process, especially
when you are in a hurry. Marking the controls settings helps a lot but it
still happens.
The AL1500 will output more power but the difference is not more than a dB
or two. It has been very rare to hear of a 3CX1200 tube failure leading one to
think the tube might be more robust than the 8877.
73,
K5GW
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|