To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Parasitic suppression kits |
From: | "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net> |
Date: | Sat, 19 Mar 2005 09:39:42 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
> Even if Mr. Measures' research is completely wrong, > the cost to installing these small modifications is minimal > compared to the cost of the rest of the project. ...And no less useful than the common inductor-formed-around-a-carbon-resistor as the parasitic suppressor. Even assuming there is no benefit to the Nichrome-style suppressor...at the end of the day, which type of suppressor is the lesser evil? Well said, Hal. -Paul,W9AC _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Amps] Parasitic suppression kits, Harold B. Mandel |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Parasitic suppression kits, Dennis |
Previous by Thread: | [Amps] Parasitic suppression kits, Harold B. Mandel |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Parasitic suppression kits, Dennis |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |