The main differences between the 8970A and B are the frequency range of the B,
that goes
to 1800 MHz (option 020, 2047 MHz), and the somewhat tighter accuracy
specification.
A "bargain" would also be the Ailtech/Eaton 2075B/205 Noise/Gain analyzer, that
does all the things that
the HP8970B does, but at a considerably lower price.
73/
Karl-Arne
SM0AOM
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@onetel.net>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 3:34 PM
Subject: [Amps] HP noise figure meters
> I was going to post this on moon-net (where the S/N is generallly
> higher), but the messages keep boucing for me.
>
> Can anyone who has used either (or preferably both) of the HP 8970A and
> 8970B noise figure meters comment on them. I'm particularly keen to know
> of the advantages of the B, as it's a lot more expensive than the A.
>
>
> --
> David Kirkby,
> G8WRB
>
> Please check out http://www.g8wrb.org/
> of if you live in Essex http://www.southminster-branch-line.org.uk/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/44 - Release Date: 2005-07-08
>
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.11/44 - Release Date: 2005-07-08
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|