On Apr 26, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Jim Kearman wrote:
>
> From: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
>
>> I'm not knocking using 1.8 as that's what I use and it works. The
>> reason I
>> broought all this up is that they do not make it clear from what I
>> read that
>> these factors are for triodes only that I seen.
>
> I suspect that when that section was written, the League was
> publishing only triode amplifiers. For many years until George
> Daughters published his 4CX1600B amplifier, all Handbook amps used
> triodes.
>
> I got the insight into the differences from reading Rich Measures's
> site. It's interesting to read the history of his Handbook chapter,
> which was presumably rejected mainly for political reasons.
It was a bit more than just that. The principal force in Newington is
seemingly not the vote of members, like Washington, D. C., it's the
influence of greenbacks, and two amplifier manufacturers who advertised
heavily in QST were definitely not happy with my article "The Nearly
Perfect Amplifier" (January, 1994).
Another factor was the ARRL's Official Observer Program. During the
early 1980s, there were a number of Official Observers here in the Land
of the Fruits and Nuts who were running amuck sending out OO cards
that, for lack of a better word, were just plain stupid. As a result,
I came up with the Official Observer Observer card so that people who
received OO cards that were inane could reply in same. When the two
guys at Newington who handled the articles I wrote got wind of the OOO
card, I sent them a sample pack. Both posted an OOO card above their
desk and reportedly got some chortles from other Staff members. One of
those who most definitely did not laugh was the OO Program Manager,
Dick Palm. When he eventually figured out who the dastardly author of
the OOO card was, he brought it up at the next general meeting and,
according to an attendee who later telephoned me, I got blacklisted for
heresy. Subsequently, the Handbook Editor, Bob Schetgen, telephoned
me, broke the contract I signed with the ARRL, told me to stop writing
the amplifier chapter for the Handbook and informed me that Tom
(MFJ-Ameritron) and Dick (Alpha) had replaced me. And that's when I
decided to make the manuscript available for free on the Internet.
> As load impedance calculations are based on the plate-voltage swing,
> it seems intuitive that the k factors for triodes and
> tetrodes/pentodes would be different.
>
>> Also, the terms differences that
>> we use where they say the plate load resistance is the same as plate
>> impedance.
>
> Assuming the load is matched, the plate is looking into a non-reactive
> impedance, so the terms could be interchanged. Considering the load as
> an impedance, though, is more in line with the fact that we are
> dealing with ac and reactances, not dc and pure resistors. My guess is
> the confusion stems mostly from erratic editing of the Handbook.
> Certain chapters are chosen for revision and updating each year. Other
> chapters, even though they may contain known errors, are not touched.
The great continental divide was the departure of QST Technical Editor,
George Grammer, W1DF, a man who understood two things: the laws of
electricity, and that QST's success depended on it's credibility.
Basically, Grammer made equipment manufacturers an offer they could not
refuse -- i. e., fix design problems or QST will review them in the
Product Review.
> It might pay to take several years' worth of Handbooks, cut them up,
> and reassemble them to produce one relatively error-free copy!
>
> 73,
>
> Jim, KR1S
> http://kr1s.kearman.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
Rich Measures, 805.386.3734, AG6K, www.somis.org
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|