Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] QST SB-220 Article

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] QST SB-220 Article
From: Rick Stealey <rstealey@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:32:44 +0000
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>


> Maybe it is just the April issue,

Good one, Pete!!!!!
I have, like you, been waiting, and wondering when this story would hit the 
news.
In fact I went back in my alibrary of QSTs and tried to find where there was 
any kind of statement made.  My research is not complete, but searching through 
over a years worth of QSTs following the original article (Oct. 1988) I could 
not find any letters to Technical Correspondance."  What did the ARRL actually 
do, make a retraction, take a position?  
In the 2006 Handbook on the parasitic suppressor subject it ends with a simple 
statement, "Some designers use nichrome or other resistance wire for L." 
Ye Gads,

Rick  K2XT
 
_________________________________________________________________
How well do you know your celebrity gossip?
http://originals.msn.com/thebigdebate?ocid=T002MSN03N0707A
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>