Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 8877 bad date codes

To: Carl <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 8877 bad date codes
From: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:12:55 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>

Carl wrote:
> There are also the early tubes that had much higher gain and Eimac did a 
> redesign. I have a 79 code that was removed from an Alpha 77 that would 
> smack a 2500W slug with around 50W drive. Owners were driving them at 100W + 
> and wiping out the grid.
>   
Those are the ones I'd want. Just remember to keep the proper drive 
level.<:-))
> One person blamed it on parasitics (;-
>   
Depends on where the parasite was located.

73

Roger (K8RI)
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
> To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 3:38 PM
> Subject: [Amps] 8877 bad date codes
>
>
>   
>> Does anyone know what years (date codes) to avoid on the 8877? I have seen
>> 8609 - 8905.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Gary  K4FMX
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>   
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>