Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] 120 Hz hum from Henry...

To: <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] 120 Hz hum from Henry...
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:21:56 -0500
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 12:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] 120 Hz hum from Henry...


> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:34:03 -0500, "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>The latest series of some amps have more C as a result of capacitor
>>technology, not engineering brilliance.
>
> REPLY:
>
> Nonsense. If less capacitance was acceptable, it would be used simply
> for cost savings. Good engineers use the minimum amount required to
> get the job done.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT


Nonsense yourself. Capacitor C per volume has gone up and prices are down so 
size constraints are a constant from the old days.

Many companies that are controlled by an engineer is doomed to failure since 
they cant accept compromises.

Carl
KM1H


 _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>