Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps.

To: Carl <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps.
From: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:52:06 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>

Carl wrote:
> I like symmetry and perfection on women followed by performance.
>
> Radios I want performance first.
>   

I think that's a reasonable approach.

73

Roger (K8RI)
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ron Youvan" <ka4inm@tampabay.rr.com>
> To: "amps" <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 2:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Why people don't build amps.
>
>
>   
>> <
>> The industry of ham radio gear placed such a weird perfectionism
>> in our brain that we find a home brewed linear amp which has not
>> all knobs symmetrical arranged and in one line is UGLY!
>> What's really ugly is our brain. " Beauty is in the eye of the
>> beholder", isn't THAT true? >
>>
>>   Not completely true, most human brains prefer symmetry* and prettiness, 
>> those without a
>> desire for clean and clear need not apply.
>>
>>   I have a Kenwood TS700A, a pretty 2 meter transceiver that is better to 
>> look at than to
>> operate.  (no tone option, 17 watts out, P.A. tune control {transistor 
>> output)}
>>
>> * symmetry: an imprecise sense of harmonious or aesthetically pleasing 
>> proportionality and
>> balance such that it reflects beauty or perfection.
>> -- 
>>    Ron  KA4INM - The next election, I know what is going to happen, I'm 
>> going to help.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps 
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>   
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>