Cecil Acuff wrote:
> Kind of strange though that the ad is high lighting the tubes more so than
> the amp. Descriptions is misleading as well. Must be reading out of the
> owners manual for the time period it was made. It's not a legal limit amp
> by today's standards..
>
> Same old Henry problem too...no 160M.
>
> They have been selling for reasonable prices in the recent past though...
>
I've seen a number of 2K4s in good shape going for $700 to $800 (some
higher and some lower)
Good amp for the price, but it's big, heavy, and as you say...no 160. I
think they'd make a whale of a base for building up a more modern one
though. Add a toroid and new band switch to redo the tank for 160-10.
Lota work though to add one band.
73
Roger(K8RI)
> Cecil
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick" <tpblogeditor@gmail.com>
> To: <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 5:18 PM
> Subject: [Amps] Now this here is a real ham's amp!
>
>
>
>> http://bit.ly/bJgIl9
>>
>> I had one of these and my 950SDX fixed. I'd never want for anything else.
>> :)
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|