Maybe another reason that we don't see too many worked-through rigorous
calculations is that there are so many variables in play and since parasitics
result from positive feedback the smallest variation in the values of the large
numbers of seemingly insignificant factors can cause huge variations in the
system behaviour down the line. The sheer randomness of many factors also comes
into play.
Do a bit of Googling about Chaos Theory versus deterministic predictability and
you'll see what I mean. Chaos is a fundamentaly different way of looking at a
problem. It has many applications from meteorology to Agile software
development, business planning and ..... who knows .... maybe parasitic
suppressors :-)
'In theory, theory and practice are the same thing. In practice they're not'
Discuss.....
Dave G0OIL
-----Original Message-----
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: "Amps reflector" <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: 16/07/2010 04:03
Subject: Re: [Amps] parasitic suppressor voodoo
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 06:29:33 +0800, Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>
wrote:
>
>Don't tell me stuff like "four turns and 50 ohms
>worked for me." I am talking science and that
>sort of approach is NOT scientific. Gimme calculations. Somebody must know
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|