Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Fillament choke

To: <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Fillament choke
From: Dave M <slash_dot@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:44:41 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Well I guess I got the answer I was hoping for , no good reason other than 
conveiniance , since I will be using the GI35b and the filament amperage is 
only 3.5 amps or so I will use #14 enamel wire and as many turns I can 
comfortably fit , thanks again guys especially for the patience , I suppose 
some of my questions have been and will be pretty simple to the more 
experienced like yourselves


......................................................................................................
Thanks and
 
73 Dave VE3DV / VE3BNF


 

> From: dezrat1242@yahoo.com
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:30:59 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Fillament choke
> 
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
> 
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:06:57 -0400, Dave M <slash_dot@msn.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> >I am sure there is going to be a simple answer , but why are ferrite rods 
> >the "preferred" method of construction verses toroid cores, I ask because I 
> >have a few ft240-43 cores and only 1 rod, winding 10 gauge on a core may be 
> >more difficult but there must be another reason ?
> 
> REPLY:
> 
> Just a guess: Easier to wind and the self-shielding properties of a
> toroid are not needed. 
> 
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
                                          
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>