Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] ferroresonant power supplies

To: "'Danny Pease'" <dpease@adams.net>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] ferroresonant power supplies
From: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Reply-to: garyschafer@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 22:23:29 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
They are rather inefficient. They draw a lot of current with a light load.

73
Gary  K4FMX

> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of Danny Pease
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 5:57 PM
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: [Amps] ferroresonant power supplies
> 
> Since ferroresonant power supplies were mentioned, I have to ask the
> question, why aren't they used for high voltage supplies? My experience
> with
> them has been at a lower voltage, 26 VDC. Is there a reason other than
> weight and expense, that they are not used for high voltage supplies?
> 
> I also did not notice the regulation being all that great on the ones I
> was
> exposed to, it seemed voltage from minimal load to full load was almost
> 10
> percent and I also noticed it seem the output voltage was higher with
> lower
> input voltage, example - a 26.5 VDC output with 230 vac in would be 29
> VDC
> out with 208 VAC in. Another issue was what I considered really high
> ripple,
> around 10 percent with almost 5 percent with minimal load and that was
> wit
> 400,000 uF of filter.
> 
> The saving grace was they had very few parts and practically never
> failed.
> 
> NG9R
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>