| To: | "Charles Harpole" <k4vud@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] Part 2 of "babying" radios and tubes, can do or not? |
| From: | "Jerry Kaidor" <jerry@tr2.com> |
| Reply-to: | jerry@tr2.com |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Jun 2012 06:26:13 -0700 (PDT) |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
\
> changes are beyond the owner's control. Except by keeping the electronic
> device always off,
*** In which case, you don't get much use out of it. And your electrolytics
deform.
- Jerry Kaidor
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] "babying" radios and tubes, can do or not?, Leigh Turner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] "babying" radios and tubes, can do or not?, Carl |
| Previous by Thread: | [Amps] Part 2 of "babying" radios and tubes, can do or not?, Charles Harpole |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Part 2 of "babying" radios and tubes, can do or not?, Carl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |