To: | "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>, amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [Amps] AFCI technology - was directr ectification |
From: | peter chadwick <g8on@fsmail.net> |
Reply-to: | g8on@fsmail.net |
Date: | Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:02 +0200 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
> If you want "sensitive" try the newest breaker technology - mandated in many places AFCI.< How do they perform with RF around? I have a 100mA RCD that trips if I use the dipole and 400 watts on 80m, and I had one breaker that with just a 1 foot length of wire connected to one terminal, would trip with 75 watts to the vertical antenna 70 feet away on 160! A letter to the manufacturer produced absolutely no response. My suspicion is that my problem ones would fail any EMC testing, but getting the manufacturer to be forced to something about it for one or two customers won't happen 73 Peter g3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Re Direct rectification of AC mains to derive the amp, VDD, supply, Manfred Mornhinweg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 129, Issue 37, John Hurst |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Re Direct rectification of AC mains to derive the amp, VDD, s, Steve Thompson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 129, Issue 37, John Hurst |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |