| To: | amps@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] Best source for Gigavac GH-1 ? |
| From: | peter chadwick <g8on@fsmail.net> |
| Reply-to: | g8on@fsmail.net |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Nov 2013 13:36:51 +0100 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
The automatic test gear we had at work testing RF ICs would wear out signal generator attenuators in 6 to 9 months. Turned out cheaper to use external electronically controlled attenuators from HP and throw them away when they failed, rather than get signal generators repaired. Typically, that was 1 to 2 million operations. 73 Peter G3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Best source for Gigavac GH-1 ?, Paul Christensen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Plate Choke question, peter chadwick |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Best source for Gigavac GH-1 ?, Jim Barber |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Best source for Gigavac GH-1 ?, peter chadwick |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |